Had it with Gitbook? Try one of the alternatives to deliver better technical documentation while increasing efficiency.
Continue reading if you consider other options, and let’s look at 10 popular Gitbook alternatives. We’ve included a wide range of solutions for users of all experience levels, both free and open-source.
Gitbook is a popular tool for creating and publishing online knowledge bases. Yet, as with any tool, there may be better options for some projects or users.
Many have reported issues with its performance and the lack of replies from support. Sometimes the feeling is that the platform doesn't deliver when managing product knowledge.
Furthermore, the platform offers fewer customization options for branded experiences for customers.
These limitations have led users to look for alternatives to GitBook. This blog post will explore these options, highlighting the key features and benefits to help you decide which platform to try. The choices include free, open-source, and SaaS options. Read until the article's end to see which option is better.
If you are in a hurry, here is the list of tools:
One alternative to Gitbook is Archbee. A powerful platform that allows users to write, collaborate and publish self-service knowledge portals quickly. One of the main advantages of using Archbee is its simplicity combined with advanced documentation capabilities.
Teams can add new content using Markdown, add rich media like videos, images, GIFs and collaborate on the same page while keeping the content up-to-date.
Archbee also has a more sleek user interface compared to Gitbook. Therefore, it is easier to get started for non-technical users so that they can work together to build up product knowledge.
Compared to other vendors, Archbee has excellent customer support. On top of this, you can contribute to the product roadmap, which means you can contribute to the development of the product.
Using the Custom Code feature in Archbee, you can brand the template to your brand guidelines. A white-label portal means no branding from the vendor, but Gitbook doesn't offer the option to remove the Powered by logo as Archbee does.
On top of this, you can design your own landing page to help customers navigate the product knowledge base.
Product knowledge can get outdated quickly, and you can only mitigate that by reviewing it at set intervals. This is where Document Verification comes in handy. With Archbee, you can define who is responsible for verifying pages.
Sometimes you need to reference a document, other times, it makes more sense to add the same piece of content in a document. But that means you will need to edit the same text block in multiple locations. This is where Reusable Content comes in handy, as it allows you to add Content Snippets or Variables in multiple documents and edit them from a single place.
For SaaS products, documentation is a must. It allows users to get started on their own time and improve product adoption and retention. As you publish content directly with Archbee, you unlock the contextual widget, which allows you to add in-product help exactly where the user needs it.
When sharing a site with specific customers, setting up an authentication method is a mandatory requirement. With Archbee, you can go from simple to complex - from password to Magic Link or JWT authentication at no extra cost. Your competitors won't be able to read your product knowledge, and you decide who will have access.
With the API economy growing yearly, publishing API documentation needs to get automated. For example, importing and syncing OpenAPI files or Postman Collections is helping software companies share up-to-date API references with customers.
Archbee offers a free plan, and when you get started, you can test all the features without paying. After the 21-day free trial expires, you can continue with the free plan, which allows sharing product knowledge base portals on a custom domain.
The Scaling plan is a good fit for a more complex site since it includes versioning and Reusable Content. The Enterprise plan is a great choice when you need access to the Archbee API and SAML.
Another alternative to Gitbook is Notion. This all-in-one workspace allows users to organize notes, tasks, wikis, and more. If you are looking for a tool for internal collaboration, Notion is a good choice. It has a large community of users that share templates you can import to your account.
One of the main advantages of Notion is its flexibility and ability to customize a page using databases. However, Notion does not have the same level of publishing options.
Because Notion is focused on internal collaboration, publishing to a custom domain requires a third-party app. This means that the process of publishing product documentation comes with an additional cost.
Any word processor can be an excellent alternative if you only need an online editor. GDocs is a widely-used tool from Google allows for real-time collaboration and commenting from any device, making it an excellent option for teams. Still, it lacks the structure and organization capabilities you would get with a tool like Gitbook.
GDocs also has a wide range of formatting options and templates. However, it is not suited for publishing to a custom domain.
Even so, you can use GDocs if you are creating docs to collaborate, but keep in mind that a generic tool like GDocs doesn't provide capabilities like GitHub sync.
Confluence is a collaboration tool from Atlassian that focuses on remote-ready teams that need to organize content. It has a built-in editor and allows for version control, making it easy to track changes and collaborate with team members. Confluence also has a wide range of templates and add-ons available, allowing users to add all types of documents for a knowledge base. However, it may have fewer options to host the documents on a custom domain.
In terms of publishing a site, you can do that with Confluence, but it requires a plugin from the marketplace to host it on a custom domain.
Readme.com is a developer hub that allows users to publish API documentation. It focuses on making API references interactive by allowing to Try out API calls, log metrics about the API call usage, and more. This means it lacks some capabilities, like a review system and several blocks, which the Gitbook editor supports.
A drawback is that the pricing for Readme is based on projects. This means that when you have multiple sites that you want to publish, the cost can get out of control, especially because some of the features are available in the Enterprise plan that starts at $2.000/month/site.
Docusaurus is a static site generator that allows anybody to create and publish sites easily.
Because MDX powers it, you can use any editor to write the content, and Docusaurus builds the static HTML files to be served.
Like any other open-source project, you need to set it up yourself and maintain it. It does have a wide range of features like translation support, search, and versioning. Still, the disadvantage of Docusaurus is that it doesn't scale well when non-technical people need to contribute to the documentation. On top of that, some features are not built in, so you either need to make it yourself or find a plugin that solves capabilities like public access controls.
Mdbook is a command-line tool for creating online portals from Markdown files. It is built in Rust and focuses on being easy to use and fast. It also supports various output formats like HTML, PDF, and ePub. It also allows you to add custom themes to give your books a unique look.
It might be a good choice for developers who prefer CLI to contribute to documentation. Still, the disadvantage of starting with Mdbook is that non-technical people need help contributing and collaborating. The review system from Gtibook it's easier to use.
ReadTheDocs is a web-based platform for building, hosting, and versioning documentation. It supports multiple languages and has built-in versioning, so you can easily switch between different versions of your documentation. It also integrates with various version control systems, including GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket. Additionally, ReadTheDocs provides a hosting service for your documentation, so you don't have to worry about setting up your server.
There is an open-source and a commercial version. Depending on what you choose, the cost will be different. You can get started for free on the open-source project, but they show ads to support the contributors. When you want to remove them, you need to make a contribution that starts from $5/month for small businesses and can go up to $50/month for corporate portals.
The commercial version has different pricing, it starts at $50/month, but if you want to add a custom domain, it goes up to $150/month.
Bookstack is a simple, self-hosted platform for organizing and storing information, focusing on creating a knowledge base. It is similar to Gitbook in its functionality but differs in how it is organized and presented. It allows you to collect information in a hierarchical structure, similar to a book, with chapters and sections. This can make it easier to navigate large documentation sets. Additionally, it has a built-in search function and the ability to add comments to pages, making it more collaborative than other open-source options.
It also packs a bunch of features like Integrated authentication, MFA, Built-in diagrams.net
Jekyll is a static site generator often used to create blogs and websites, similar to Gitbook in its ability to generate documentation from markdown files. Jekyll is built in Ruby and is known for its flexibility and ease of use. It also has a large community and a wide variety of plugins and themes available. Jekyll's main advantage is that it is highly customizable, allowing users to create unique designs and layouts for their documentation.
Also, it can be hosted on Github pages making it a real competitor if you want to choose a free, open-source option.
On the other hand, non-technical users will have a steep learning curve to start contributing.
Now that you have viewed 10 alternatives to Gitbook, it's a good idea to see what you are looking for in a knowledge base for your own needs. We've picked options that are suited for hosting documentation for employees at your company and public-facing docs on your domain.
In conclusion, there are several alternatives to Gitbook that are available out there. Each one has its own set of advantages and disadvantages, and the best choice will depend on your specific needs and project requirements. Consider giving Archbee, Notion, Bookstack, and Docusaurus a try to see which works best for you. Remember, you can choose the right tool to get your job done; it depends on your requirements and how you want to set up a team collaboration in writing documentation.
GitBook can be a good option for internal knowledge bases, as it offers features such as collaboration, version control, and easy customization. However, the suitability of GitBook for your specific use case depends on your organization's size, needs, and preferences.
No. There is a similarity in the names, but Gitbook is not part of GitHub. It started as a way to publish GitHub repositories on the web.
While it may be hard to get started, the user interface is easy to use, and developers and business users can collaborate.
Gitbook open source is no longer maintained.
It depends on your needs and preferences. GitBook is a good option if you need an easy-to-use platform for creating and hosting documentation, and if you don't mind the limitations of its proprietary nature.